Tag Archive: Animal Farm


Electric Re-Tooling

On October 1, 2008, I posted an essay entitled ‘Will They Sing the B’rack Electric?’, an obvious play on ‘I Sing the Body Electric, the title of an 1855 poem by Walt Whitman; the title of a short story by Ray Bradbury and a 1962 Twilight Zone episode; the title of Bradbury’s later [1969] book of short stories; and the title of the 1972 musical album by the Weather Report—the latter no relation to Obama friend Bill Ayer’s Weather Underground group of terrorists.

Within this essay were references to the books of George Orwell, specifically the 1945 ‘Animal Farm’ and the 1949 ’1984.’  The links below go to Wikipedia articles on the two books.

Animal Farm 1984

These are far better summaries of the books than I can give in a short essay.

While reading these, you might want to consider some of the reality of Barack Obama as noted below, and I’d like to quote a few lines from the Encyclopedia entry as a start:

‘”Orwellian” can also refer to governmental propagandizing by the misnaming of things; hence the “Ministry of Peace” in the novel actually deals with war and the “Ministry of Love” actually tortures people. Since the novel’s publication “Orwellian” has in fact become somewhat of a catch-all for any kind of governmental overreach or dishonesty and therefore has multiple meanings and applications. The phrase Big Brother is Watching You specifically connotes pervasive, invasive surveillance but can also refer to attempts to over-regulate or legislate societal behaviour.’
***
From Family Security Matters: ‘And, after he [Obama] was elected to the U.S. Senate, his wife, Michelle, told a reporter, “Barack is not a politician first and foremost. He’s a community activist exploring the viability of politics to make change.” Recalling her remark in 2005, Obama wrote, “I take that observation as a compliment.”‘
***
Ken Blackwell:  ‘…Never in my life have I seen a presidential frontrunner whose rhetoric is so far removed from his record. Walter Mondale promised to raise our taxes, and he lost. George McGovern promised military weakness, and he lost. Michael Dukakis promised a liberal domestic agenda, and he lost.

Yet Mr. Obama is promising all those things, and he’s not behind in the polls. Why? Because the press has dealt with him as if he were in a beauty pageant…’
***
Linda Chavez:  ‘Last fall, Sen. Obama stirred a similar controversy when he talked about his decision to quit wearing a flag lapel pin that he, like many members of Congress and others, had worn since the Sept. 11 attacks. He said that the pins had become “a substitute for … true patriotism, which is speaking out on issues that are of importance to our national security.” He added, “I decided I won’t wear that pin on my chest. Instead, I’m going to try to tell the American people what I believe will make this country great, and hopefully that will be a testimony to my patriotism.”

It is as if both Obamas are suggesting that America is somehow lacking, unless a President Obama can change it. It is a theme that seems to resonate with liberals: America could be a great nation — if only liberals were in charge.

[Since that time, Obama has been wearing the lapel flag.]
***
W Thomas Smith Jr:  ‘…Obama did, however, receive Muslim training as a boy. His father, Barack Obama Sr., was a Muslim, as was Obama Jr.’s stepfather, Lolo Soetoro. And we are now discovering, Junior offered direct political support to at least one African leader, Raila Odinga, with ties to radical Islam as recent as seven months ago…’
***
‘…I don’t want to punish your success…’
‘…spread the wealth…’
‘…good for everybody…’

A wise man makes his own decisions, an ignorant man follows the public opinion. – Chinese proverb

Does anyone see disturbing parallels in this so-called ‘Age of Obama’?  [Oh sorry, I know that's the name of the book to be published on election day by the moderator of the Vice Presidential debate.] We can best formulate our answers after reading George Orwell’s ‘Animal Farm’ and ’1984.’  I guarantee you’ll see what I mean with respect to Barack Obama.  Get the books and read them.  They may be the most important books in this election cycle.

[Hope!  Change! Obama our Saviour!]

With his political scenario, the rules of life will change, the populace will work hard, and Mr Obama will tell us what to do and how to do it.  Obama has already been telling interviewers that he wants to take money from the ‘rich’ earning $250 G a year and give it to the poor.  But, according to him, that’s not socialism, that’s just a nice thing the ‘rich’ person will want to do.  [Yes, I heard him say this!]

[Pay high taxes as a factor of patriotism!]

When he’s campaigning, the kool-aid crowd chants and serenades him as he speaks—notably in generalities, just enough to get the crowd active.  He has the ‘Obama Youth’ as exemplified by his rush to have Ohio students registering and voting on the same day.  Hmmm.  Wasn’t there someone else with a ‘Youth’ movement?

Now, Obama has children singing his campaign slogans.  Check out You Tube if you want.  These are further examples of his messianic position.  And frankly, it’s getting scary.  Are we electing a President or anointing a Saint?  Once again, does an empty suit flap in the wind?

[Something vague we can believe in?]

But why all this hysteria?  Obama has never done anything worth noting.  He has no experience.  He has too many and too deep connections with vocal radicals, law breakers and socialists [To put it mildly.]  All he does is fantasize about a mythical hope and change.

[Trust me!  I know all the answers!]

His photos and campaign posters [with picture] are almost enshrined in many homes as the families living there gather together and sing hymns to him every evening.  They know no other candidate, and they pray before his arrogant pose for the Sainthood ceremony.  He is mythical hope personified—and never mind the fact that he wants to run the most powerful Country the World has ever seen—and when he preaches [that's what he does] he wants to sound like your Big Brother and righter of all wrongs.

He has no practical or theoretical experience for this position, but he wants it anyway.  Based on his personal history, he’ll immediately start looking for another office.  Will he appoint himself to the Supreme Court?

This is truly the start of a Big Brother.  Will our country be awash with huge photos of Obama as the communist countries are with their leaders?  Will our new taxes be akin to confiscation so that he can dole the funds out to the ‘poor’ people, whether or not they exist in fact as he envisions them, and whether or not they want the government Obama meddling in their lives?  Will we all be required to tune in and listen to him when he’s pontificating on the television—on pain of friendly caning?

Cameras on every street corner?  [Oh, right.  That's already being done in Liberal London.]  Everybody marrying everybody else?  Nationalization [so they don't fail and hurt the little guy] of everything from autoplants to the local bar?

[Take from the rich and give to the poor:  Robin O!  Robin O!  Ridin' through the glen...]

‘Everybody is equal—except that some people are more equal than others.’

Don’t follow a leader who is actually working for you, follow one with the biggest pack at his beck and call.  We are lost in a bad novel!  Unfortunately, we’re going to have public riots no matter who wins the Presidency.

Read Orwell’s books, and then think about Obama again.  It’s scary.

He’s Barack Obama, and I doubt he’d approve of this message.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.